4.4 Article

Prognostic value of negative interim 2-[18F]-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose PET/CT in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma

期刊

CLINICAL RADIOLOGY
卷 71, 期 3, 页码 280-286

出版社

W B SAUNDERS CO LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.crad.2015.11.019

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

AIM: To assess the prognostic value of negative interim combined 2-[F-18]-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose (F-18-FDG) positron-emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ninety-two patients with histologically proven DLBCL were enrolled. All of the patients underwent F-18-FDG PET/CT at diagnosis, and interim PET/CT after the second cycle of chemotherapy with rituximab, cyclophosphamide, hydroxydaunorubicin, vincristine, and prednisolone (R-CHOP). Negative interim PET/CT was defined as the disappearance of all abnormal F-18-FDG uptake compared to the pretreatment PET/CT image, as determined by visual assessment. The clinical outcome of patients was estimated as progression-free survival (PFS), and the prognostic significance of clinicopathological and imaging parameters were assessed using the Cox proportional hazards model. RESULTS: Thirty-six patients (39.1%) showed lymphoma progression within a median follow-up of 30.8 months. According to univariate analysis, Ann Arbor stage, serum lactate dehydrogenase level, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group scale, International Prognostic Index (IPI) score, and maximum standardised uptake values on initial PET/CT were significant prognostic factors for PFS (all p<0.05). Among these parameters, only the IPI score was an independent predictor for PFS (p=0.044). Survival of patients with a high IPI score (>= 3) was poorer than those with a low IPI score (0-2; p<0.001). CONCLUSION: Despite a negative interim F-18-FDG PET/CT, approximately 39% of DLBCL patients showed progression during follow-up. Although the negative PET/CT was obtained during chemotherapy, it is important to closely follow-up patients, especially those with a high IPI score. (C) 2015 The Royal College of Radiologists. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据