4.6 Article

Combustion-processed NiO/ALD TiO2 bilayer as a novel low-temperature electron transporting material for efficient all-inorganic CsPbIBr2 solar cell

期刊

SOLAR ENERGY
卷 203, 期 -, 页码 10-18

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.solener.2020.04.024

关键词

Electron transporting material; NiO/TiO2 bilayer; ALD; Solution combustion; Low temperature; All-inorganic CsPbIBZ(2) solar cells

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61804113, 61874083, 61704128, BX20190261]
  2. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2019M663628]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of Shaanxi Province [2018ZDCXL-GY-08-02-02, 2017JM6049]
  4. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [JB181107, JBX171103]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Low-temperature ALD TiO2 electron transporting layers (ETLs) are promising for all-inorganic perovskite solar cells (PSCs), such as the CsPbIBr2-based ones. However, the non-ideal interfacial level-alignment between ALD TiO2 and CsPbIBr2, as well as the concomitant defects in ALD TiO2 during preparation of upper CsPbIBr2 film severely limit the performance of final PSC. We report herein a new design of ETL by combining ALD TiO2 with low-temperature combustion-processed NiO. Although the underlying NiO layer has a p-type conductivity and is known as a hole transporting layer (HTL), the NiO/ALD TiO2 bilayer can serve as an ETL with fewer traps, larger conduction band minimum (CBM) offset with CsPbIBr2 film, along with the similar optical transmittance, in contrast with individual ALD TiO2 ETL. Consequently, the resulting optimized CsPbIBr2PSC yields the superior efficiency of 9.71% and photovoltage of 1.272 V, both of which exceed those of the one based on individual ALD TiO2 ETL and even so-gel TiO2 ETL. Our work verifies the great applicability of NiO/ALD TiO2 ETL for CsPbIBr2 PSC and thereby explores a promising way to develop more low-temperature ETLs by combining conventional HTLs with ALD TiO2 layers.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据