4.8 Article

Hierarchical Nanorods of MoS2/MoP Heterojunction for Efficient Electrocatalytic Hydrogen Evolution Reaction

期刊

SMALL
卷 16, 期 32, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/smll.202002482

关键词

electrocatalysis; hierarchical nanostructures; hydrogen evolution reaction; MoS2; MoP heterojunctions

资金

  1. Thousand Youth Talents Plan of China
  2. Thousand Youth Talents Plan of Guangdong Province
  3. International S&T Cooperation Program of China [2017YFE0127800]
  4. Hunan Provincial Science and Technology Program [2017XK2026]
  5. Project of Innovation-Driven Plan in Central South University [20180018050001]
  6. Shenzhen Science and Technology Innovation Project [JCYJ20180307151313532]
  7. 100 Talents Plan Foundation of Sun Yat-sen University
  8. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities
  9. Program for Guangdong Introducing Innovative and Entrepreneurial Teams [2017ZT07C069]
  10. NSFC [21821003, 21890380, 21905315, 21872174, U1932148]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Hierarchical nanostructures with tailored component and architectures are attractive for energy-related applications. Here, the delicate design and construction of hierarchical MoS2/MoP (H-MoS2/MoP) nanorods for the hydrogen evolution reaction (HER) are demonstrated. This multiscale design rationally combines the compositional and structural advantages of MoS2/MoP heterojunction into a hierarchical architecture, which can modulate electronic structure of S, remarkably facilitating the electrocatalytic HER. Benefitting from their unique architecture and electronic structure, the H-MoS2/MoP nanorods exhibit excellent performance for HER with ultralow overpotential of 92 mV at current density of 10 mA cm(-2)in 1mKOH and high stability. This work not only provides an efficient approach to constructing hierarchical heterojunctions, but also a multiscale strategy for all-round regulation of the electronic structure and hierarchical morphology of nanomaterials for energy-related applications.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据