4.8 Article

Single Ni Atoms Anchored on Porous Few-Layer g-C3N4 for Photocatalytic CO2 Reduction: The Role of Edge Confinement

期刊

SMALL
卷 16, 期 28, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/smll.202002411

关键词

edge confinement; photocatalytic CO2 reduction; porous few-layer g-C3N4; single-atomic photocatalysis; unsaturated Ni-N coordination

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51672099, 21403079]
  2. Sichuan Science and Technology Program [2019JDRC0027]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [2017-QR-25]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

It is greatly intriguing yet remains challenging to construct single-atomic photocatalysts with stable surface free energy, favorable for well-defined atomic coordination and photocatalytic carrier mobility during the photoredox process. Herein, an unsaturated edge confinement strategy is defined by coordinating single-atomic-site Ni on the bottom-up synthesized porous few-layer g-C3N4 (namely, Ni-5-CN) via a self-limiting method. This Ni-5-CN system with a few isolated Ni clusters distributed on the edge of g-C3N4 is beneficial to immobilize the nonedged single-atomic-site Ni species, thus achieving a high single-atomic active site density. Remarkably, the Ni-5-CN system exhibits comparably high photocatalytic activity for CO2 reduction, giving the CO generation rate of 8.6 mu mol g(-1) h(-1) under visible-light illumination, which is 7.8 times that of pure porous few-layer g-C3N4 (namely, CN, 1.1 mu mol g(-1) h(-1)). X-ray absorption spectrometric analysis unveils that the cationic coordination environment of single-atomic-site Ni center, which is formed by Ni-N doping-intercalation the first coordination shell, motivates the superiority in synergistic N-Ni-N connection and interfacial carrier transfer. The photocatalytic mechanistic prediction confirms that the introduced unsaturated Ni-N coordination favorably binds with CO2, and enhances the rate-determining step of intermediates for CO generation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据