4.8 Article

A High-Capacity Negative Electrode for Asymmetric Supercapacitors Based on a PMo12Coordination Polymer with Novel Water-Assisted Proton Channels

期刊

SMALL
卷 16, 期 29, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/smll.202001626

关键词

asymmetric supercapacitors; negative electrodes; polyoxometalate; proton channels; ultrahigh energy density

资金

  1. National Science Foundation of China [21671049, 51572063, 21701037]
  2. NSF of Heilongjiang Province [LH2019B027]
  3. Fundamental Research Foundation for Universities of Heilongjiang Province [LGYC2018JQ007]
  4. University Nursing Program for Young Scholars with Creative Talents in Heilongjiang Province [UNPYSCT-2018186]
  5. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [2017-KYYWF-0141]
  6. Spanish MINECO (AEI/FEDER, UE) [CTQ2017-87201-P]
  7. Generalidad Valenciana [Prometeo/2019/076]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The development of a negative electrode for supercapacitors is a critical challenge for the next-generation of energy-storage devices. Herein, two new electrodes formed by the coordination polymers [Ni(itmb)(4)(HPMo12O40)]center dot 2H(2)O (1) and [Zn(itmb)(3)(H2O)(HPMo12O40)]center dot 4H(2)O (2) (itmb = 1-(imidazo-1-ly)-4-(1,2,4-triazol-1-ylmethyl)benzene), synthesized by a simple hydrothermal method, are described. Compounds1and2show high capacitances of 477.9 and 890.2 F g(-1), respectively. An asymmetric supercapacitor device assembled using2which has novel water-assisted proton channels as negative electrode and active carbon as positive electrode shows ultrahigh energy density and power density of 23.4 W h kg(-1)and 3864.4 W kg(-1), respectively. Moreover, the ability to feed a red light emitting diode (LED) also demonstrates the feasibility for practical use. The results allow a better elucidation of the storage mechanism in polyoxometalate-based coordination polymers and provide a promising direction for exploring novel negative materials for new-generation high-performance supercapacitors.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据