4.0 Article

Peripheral blood flow changes in response to postexercise cold water immersion

期刊

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/cpf.12380

关键词

cooling; Doppler ultrasound; laser doppler; near-infrared spectroscopy; recovery

资金

  1. School of Exercise and Health Sciences, Edith Cowan University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study compared the effect of postexercise water immersion (WI) at different temperatures on common femoral artery blood flow (CFA), muscle (total haemoglobin; tHb) and skin perfusion (cutaneous vascular conductance; CVC), assessed by Doppler ultrasound, near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) and laser Doppler flowmetry, respectively. Given that heat stress may influence the vascular response during cooling, nine men cycled for 25min at the first ventilatory threshold followed by intermittent 30-s cycling at 90% peak power until exhaustion at 328 +/- 04 degrees C and 32 +/- 5% RH. They then received 5-min WI at 86 +/- 02 degrees C (WI9), 146 +/- 03 degrees C (WI15), 350 +/- 04 degrees C (WI35) or passive rest (CON) in a randomized, crossover manner. Heart rate (HR), mean arterial pressure (MAP), muscle (T-mu), thigh skin (T-thigh), rectal (T-re) and mean body (T-body) temperatures were assessed. At 60min postimmersion, decreases in T-re after WI35 (-06 +/- 03 degrees C) and CON (-06 +/- 03 degrees C) were different from WI15 (-10 +/- 03 degrees C; P<005), but not from WI9 (-10 +/- 03 degrees C; P=0074-0092). WI9 and WI15 had reduced T-body, T-thigh and T-mu compared with WI35 and CON (P <005). CFA, tHb and CVC were lower in WI9 and WI15 compared with CON (P<005). tHb following WI9 remained lower than CON (P=0044) at 30min postimmersion. CVC correlated with tHb during non-cooling (WI35 and CON) (r(2)=0532; P<0001) and cooling recovery (WI9 and WI15) (r(2)=019; P=0035). WI9 resulted in prolonged reduction in muscle perfusion. This suggests that CWI below 10 degrees C should not be used for short-term (i.e. <60min) recovery after exercise.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据