4.6 Article

Assessment of Gold Bio-Functionalization for Wide-Interface Biosensing Platforms

期刊

SENSORS
卷 20, 期 13, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/s20133678

关键词

surface plasmon resonance; biosensors; bio-functionalization optimization; cost-effective biosensors; lab-on-a-chip

资金

  1. H2020-Electronic Smart Systems-SiMBiT: Single molecule bio-electronic smart system array for clinical testing [824946]
  2. Italian MIUR PON project PMGB -Sviluppo di piattaforme meccatroniche, genomiche e bioinformatiche per l'oncologia di precisione [ARS01_01195]
  3. CSGI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The continuous improvement of the technical potential of bioelectronic devices for biosensing applications will provide clinicians with a reliable tool for biomarker quantification down to the single molecule. Eventually, physicians will be able to identify the very moment at which the illness state begins, with a terrific impact on the quality of life along with a reduction of health care expenses. However, in clinical practice, to gather enough information to formulate a diagnosis, multiple biomarkers are normally quantified from the same biological sample simultaneously. Therefore, it is critically important to translate lab-based bioelectronic devices based on electrolyte gated thin-film transistor technology into a cost-effective portable multiplexing array prototype. In this perspective, the assessment of cost-effective manufacturability represents a crucial step, with specific regard to the optimization of the bio-functionalization protocol of the transistor gate module. Hence, we have assessed, using surface plasmon resonance technique, a sustainable and reliable cost-effective process to successfully bio-functionalize a gold surface, suitable as gate electrode for wide-field bioelectronic sensors. The bio-functionalization process herein investigated allows to reduce the biorecognition element concentration to one-tenth, drastically impacting the manufacturing costs while retaining high analytical performance.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据