4.6 Article

Reliability of Kinovea® Software and Agreement with a Three-Dimensional Motion System for Gait Analysis in Healthy Subjects

期刊

SENSORS
卷 20, 期 11, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/s20113154

关键词

biomechanics; agreement; gait; visual gait analysis; optical motion capture; reliability

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Gait analysis is necessary to diagnose movement disorders. In order to reduce the costs of three-dimensional motion capture systems, new low-cost methods of motion analysis have been developed. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the inter- and intra-rater reliability of Kinovea((R)) and the agreement with a three-dimensional motion system for detecting the joint angles of the hip, knee and ankle during the initial contact phase of walking. Fifty healthy subjects participated in this study. All participants were examined twice with a one-week interval between the two appointments. The motion data were recorded using the VICON Motion System((R)) and digital video cameras. The intra-rater reliability showed a good correlation for the hip, the knee and the ankle joints (Intraclass Correlation Coefficient, ICC > 0.85) for both observers. The ICC for the inter-rater reliability was >0.90 for the hip, the knee and the ankle joints. The Bland-Altman plots showed that the magnitude of disagreement was approximately +/- 5 degrees for intra-rater reliability, +/- 2.5 degrees for inter-rater reliability and around +/- 2.5 degrees to +/- 5 degrees for Kinovea((R)) versus Vicon((R)). The ICC was good for the hip, knee and ankle angles registered with Kinovea((R)) during the initial contact of walking for both observers (intra-rater reliability) and higher for the agreement between observers (inter-rater reliability). However, the Bland-Altman plots showed disagreement between observers, measurements and systems (Kinovea((R)) vs. three-dimensional motion system) that should be considered in the interpretation of clinical evaluations.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据