相关参考文献
注意:仅列出部分参考文献,下载原文获取全部文献信息。International evaluation of an AI system for breast cancer screening
Scott Mayer McKinney et al.
NATURE (2020)
Comparison of a Deep Learning Risk Score and Standard Mammographic Density Score for Breast Cancer Risk Prediction
Karin Dembrower et al.
RADIOLOGY (2020)
Changes in cancer detection and false-positive recall in mammography using artificial intelligence: a retrospective, multireader study
Hyo-Eun Kim et al.
LANCET DIGITAL HEALTH (2020)
Transfer Learning From Convolutional Neural Networks for Computer-Aided Diagnosis: A Comparison of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis and Full-Field Digital Mammography
Kayla Mendel et al.
ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY (2019)
Stand-Alone Artificial Intelligence for Breast Cancer Detection in Mammography: Comparison With 101 Radiologists
Alejandro Rodriguez-Ruiz et al.
JNCI-JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE (2019)
Detection of Breast Cancer with Mammography: Effect of an Artificial Intelligence Support System
Alejandro Rodriguez-Ruiz et al.
RADIOLOGY (2019)
A Deep Learning Mammography-based Model for Improved Breast Cancer Risk Prediction
Adam Yala et al.
RADIOLOGY (2019)
Multi-criterion mammographic risk analysis supported with multi-label fuzzy-rough feature selection
Yanpeng Qu et al.
ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN MEDICINE (2019)
A Deep Learning Model to Triage Screening Mammograms: A Simulation Study
Adam Yala et al.
RADIOLOGY (2019)
Artificial intelligence and breast screening: French Radiology Community position paper
I Thomassin-Naggara et al.
DIAGNOSTIC AND INTERVENTIONAL IMAGING (2019)
Decrease in interpretation time for both novice and experienced readers using a concurrent computer-aided detection system for digital breast tomosynthesis
Eun Young Chae et al.
EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY (2019)
A Review of the Role of Augmented Intelligence in Breast Imaging: From Automated Breast Density Assessment to Risk Stratification
Andrea Arieno et al.
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY (2019)
Concurrent Computer-Aided Detection Improves Reading Time of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis and Maintains Interpretation Performance in a Multireader Multicase Study
Richard A. Benedikt et al.
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY (2018)
Simultaneous detection and classification of breast masses in digital mammograms via a deep learning YOLO-based CAD system
Mohammed A. Al-masni et al.
COMPUTER METHODS AND PROGRAMS IN BIOMEDICINE (2018)
Classification of Whole Mammogram and Tomosynthesis Images Using Deep Convolutional Neural Networks
Xiaofei Zhang et al.
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON NANOBIOSCIENCE (2018)
Deep learning in mammography and breast histology, an overview and future trends
Azam Hamidinekoo et al.
MEDICAL IMAGE ANALYSIS (2018)
Digital Breast Tomosynthesis and Synthetic 2D Mammography versus Digital Mammography: Evaluation in a Population-based Screening Program
Solveig Hofvind et al.
RADIOLOGY (2018)
Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries
Freddie Bray et al.
CA-A CANCER JOURNAL FOR CLINICIANS (2018)
A review of computer aided detection in mammography
Janine Katzen et al.
CLINICAL IMAGING (2018)
Deep Learning to Distinguish Recalled but Benign Mammography Images in Breast Cancer Screening
Sarah S. Aboutalib et al.
CLINICAL CANCER RESEARCH (2018)
One-view breast tomosynthesis versus two-view mammography in the Malmo Breast Tomosynthesis Screening Trial (MBTST): a prospective, population-based, diagnostic accuracy study
Sophia Zackrisson et al.
LANCET ONCOLOGY (2018)
Evolutionary pruning of transfer learned deep convolutional neural network for breast cancer diagnosis in digital breast tomosynthesis
Ravi K. Samala et al.
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY (2018)
Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of double reading in digital mammography screening: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Margarita Posso et al.
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY (2017)
Deep Learning in Mammography Diagnostic Accuracy of a Multipurpose Image Analysis Software in the Detection of Breast Cancer
Anton S. Becker et al.
INVESTIGATIVE RADIOLOGY (2017)
Large scale deep learning for computer aided detection of mammographic lesions
Thijs Kooi et al.
MEDICAL IMAGE ANALYSIS (2017)
A survey on deep learning in medical image analysis
Geert Litjens et al.
MEDICAL IMAGE ANALYSIS (2017)
Multi-task transfer learning deep convolutional neural network: application to computer-aided diagnosis of breast cancer on mammograms
Ravi K. Samala et al.
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY (2017)
Performance of one-view breast tomosynthesis as a stand-alone breast cancer screening modality: results from the Malmo Breast Tomosynthesis Screening Trial, a population-based study
Kristina Lang et al.
EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY (2016)
Deep Convolutional Neural Networks for Computer-Aided Detection: CNN Architectures, Dataset Characteristics and Transfer Learning
Hoo-Chang Shin et al.
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MEDICAL IMAGING (2016)
Breast cancer screening with tomosynthesis (3D mammography) with acquired or synthetic 2D mammography compared with 2D mammography alone (STORM-2): a population-based prospective study
Daniela Bernardi et al.
LANCET ONCOLOGY (2016)
Mass detection in digital breast tomosynthesis: Deep convolutional neural network with transfer learning from mammography
Ravi K. Samala et al.
MEDICAL PHYSICS (2016)
Analysis of computer-aided detection techniques and signal characteristics for clustered microcalcifications on digital mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis
Ravi K. Samala et al.
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY (2016)
Effect of the Availability of Prior Full-Field Digital Mammography and Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Images on the Interpretation of Mammograms
Christiane M. Hakim et al.
RADIOLOGY (2015)
Accuracy of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis for Depicting Breast Cancer Subgroups in a UK Retrospective Reading Study (TOMMY Trial)
Fiona J. Gilbert et al.
RADIOLOGY (2015)
Diagnostic Accuracy of Digital Screening Mammography With and Without Computer-Aided Detection
Constance D. Lehman et al.
JAMA INTERNAL MEDICINE (2015)
Inter- and Intra-Observer Variations in the Delineation of Lesions in Mammograms
Thomas Buelow et al.
MEDICAL IMAGING 2015: IMAGE PERCEPTION, OBSERVER PERFORMANCE, AND TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT (2015)
Detection of soft tissue densities from digital breast tomosynthesis: comparison of conventional and deep learning approaches
Sergei V. Fotin et al.
MEDICAL IMAGING 2016: COMPUTER-AIDED DIAGNOSIS (2015)
Comparison of Direct Digital Mammography, Computed Radiography, and Film-Screen in the French National Breast Cancer Screening Program
Brigitte Seradour et al.
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY (2014)
European Breast Cancer Service Screening Outcomes: A First Balance Sheet of the Benefits and Harms
Eugenio Paci et al.
CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY BIOMARKERS & PREVENTION (2014)
Technical and clinical breast cancer screening performance indicators for computed radiography versus direct digital radiography
Hilde Bosmans et al.
EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY (2013)
Integration of 3D digital mammography with tomosynthesis for population breast-cancer screening (STORM): a prospective comparison study
Stefano Ciatto et al.
LANCET ONCOLOGY (2013)
Mass detection in reconstructed digital breast tomosynthesis volumes with a computer-aided detection system trained on 2D mammograms
Guido van Schie et al.
MEDICAL PHYSICS (2013)
Comparison of Digital Mammography Alone and Digital Mammography Plus Tomosynthesis in a Population-based Screening Program
Per Skaane et al.
RADIOLOGY (2013)
Improving Performance of Computer-aided Detection of Masses by Incorporating Bilateral Mammographic Density Asymmetry: An Assessment
Xingwei Wang et al.
ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY (2012)
Studies Comparing Screen-Film Mammography and Full-Field Digital Mammography in Breast Cancer Screening: Updated Review
P. Skaane
ACTA RADIOLOGICA (2009)
The Laboratory effect: Comparing radiologists' performance and variability during prospective clinical and laboratory mammography interpretations
David Gur et al.
RADIOLOGY (2008)
Randomized trial of screen-film versus full-field digital mammography with soft-copy reading in population-based screening program: Follow-up and final results of Oslo II study
Per Skaane et al.
RADIOLOGY (2007)
Influence of computer-aided detection on performance of screening mammography
Joshua J. Fenton et al.
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE (2007)
Combining two mammographic projections in a computer aided mass detection method
Saskia van Engeland et al.
MEDICAL PHYSICS (2007)
Importance of comparison of current and prior mammograms in breast cancer screening
Antonius A. J. Roelofs et al.
RADIOLOGY (2007)
Use of prior mammograms in the classification of benign and malignant masses
C Varela et al.
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY (2005)
Diagnostic performance of digital versus film mammography for breast-cancer screening
ED Pisano et al.
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE (2005)
Computer-aided detection output on 172 subtle findings on normal mammograms previously obtained in women with breast cancer detected at follow-up screening mammography
DM Ikeda et al.
RADIOLOGY (2004)
Can computer-aided detection with double reading of screening mammograms help decrease the false-negative rate? Initial experience
SV Destounis et al.
RADIOLOGY (2004)
Screen-film mammography versus full-field digital mammography with soft-copy reading: Randomized trial in a population-based screening program - The Oslo II study
P Skaane et al.
RADIOLOGY (2004)
Optimal reference mammography: A comparison of mammograms obtained 1 and 2 years before the present examination
JH Sumkin et al.
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY (2003)
Population-based mammography screening: Comparison of screen-film and full-field digital mammography with soft-copy reading - Oslo I study
P Skaane et al.
RADIOLOGY (2003)
Screening mammography with computer-aided detection: Prospective study of 12,860 patients in a community breast center
TW Freer et al.
RADIOLOGY (2001)
Mammographic characteristics of 115 missed cancers later detected with screening mammography and the potential utility of computer-aided detection
RL Birdwell et al.
RADIOLOGY (2001)
Effect on sensitivity and specificity of mammography screening with or without comparison of old mammograms
MG Thurfjell et al.
ACTA RADIOLOGICA (2000)