4.5 Article

Crystal structure of the hinge domain of Smchd1 reveals its dimerization mode and nucleic acid-binding residues

期刊

SCIENCE SIGNALING
卷 13, 期 636, 页码 -

出版社

AMER ASSOC ADVANCEMENT SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1126/scisignal.aaz5599

关键词

-

资金

  1. Australian Research Training Program scholarship
  2. Melbourne Research Scholarship International
  3. Cancer Council Victoria fellowship
  4. Bellberry-Viertel Senior Medical Research Fellowship
  5. Australian National Health and Medical Research Council fellowships [1079700, 1105754, 1172929, 1098290]
  6. Victorian State Government Operational Infrastructure Support
  7. Australian National Health and Medical Research Council IRIISS grant [9000433]
  8. InSPIRE program

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Structural maintenance of chromosomes flexible hinge domain containing 1 (SMCHD1) is an epigenetic regulator in which polymorphisms cause the human developmental disorder, Bosma arhinia micropthalmia syndrome, and the degenerative disease, facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy. SMCHD1 is considered a noncanonical SMC family member because its hinge domain is C-terminal, because it homodimerizes rather than heterodimerizes, and because SMCHD1 contains a GHKL-type, rather than an ABC-type ATPase domain at its N terminus. The hinge domain has been previously implicated in chromatin association; however, the underlying mechanism involved and the basis for SMCHD1 homodimerization are unclear. Here, we used x-ray crystallography to solve the three-dimensional structure of the Smchd1 hinge domain. Together with structure-guided mutagenesis, we defined structural features of the hinge domain that participated in homodimerization and nucleic acid binding, and we identified a functional hotspot required for chromatin localization in cells. This structure provides a template for interpreting the mechanism by which patient polymorphisms within the SMCHD1 hinge domain could compromise function and lead to facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据