4.7 Article

The impact of COVID-19 partial lockdown on the air quality of the city of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

期刊

SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT
卷 729, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.139085

关键词

COVID-19; Lockdown; Nitrogen dioxide; PM10; Carbon monoxide; Ozone

资金

  1. Coordenacao de Aperfeicoamento de Pessoal de Nivel Superior (CAPES)
  2. National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq) [409930/2018-0]
  3. Fundacao Carlos Chagas Filho de Amparo a Pesquisa no Estado do Rio de Janeiro (FAPERJ) [E26/010.001798/2019]
  4. CNPq
  5. FUNADESP

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The first COVID-19 case in Brazilwas confirmed on February 25, 2020. OnMarch 16, the state's governor declared public health emergency in the city of Rio de Janeiro and partial lockdown measures came into force aweek later. Themain goal of thiswork is to discuss the impact of the measures on the air quality of the city by comparing the particulate matter, carbon monoxide, nitrogen dioxide and ozone concentrations determined during the partial lockdown with values obtained in the same period of 2019 and also with the weeks prior to the virus outbreak. Concentrations varied with substantial differences among pollutants and also among the three studied monitoring stations. CO levels showed themost significant reductions (30.3-48.5%) since theywere related to light-duty vehicular emissions. NO2 also showed reductions while PM10 levels were only reduced in the first lockdown week. In April, an increase in vehicular flux and movement of people was observed mainly as a consequence of the lack of consensus about the importance and need of social distancing and lockdown. Ozone concentrations increased probably due to the decrease in nitrogen oxides level. When comparing with the same period of 2019, NO2 and CO median values were 24.1-32.9 and 37.0-43.6% lower. Meteorological interferences, mainly the transport of pollutants from the industrial areas might have also impacted the results. (C) 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据