4.7 Article

Enhanced phytoremediation of PAHs and cadmium contaminated soils by a Mycobacterium

期刊

SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT
卷 754, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.141198

关键词

Cd contamination; Microbial activities; Phospholipid fatty acids; Plant-microorganism combined remediation; Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs); PAH-Cd co-contamination

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31470547, 31770545]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Fire Phoenix and N12 exhibited enhanced growth and removal capabilities in soils contaminated with PAHs and Cd, while E. purpurea did not show significant improvement. The enhanced removal of PAHs by Fire Phoenix and N12 was related to improved rhizosphere microbial activities.
This study investigated Fire Phoenix (Festuca L.) and Echinacea purpurea (L.) Moench inoculated with a Mycobacterium strain N12 in remediation of soils contaminated with both polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) and cadmium (Cd). Plant growth and PAH and Cd removal were monitored in 60, 120, and 150 days after transplanting. Results showed that Fire Phoenix plants grown in soil containing 200 mg/kg PAHs and 15 mg/kg Cd inoculated with N12 were able to remove 76.3% PAHs compared to removal of 68.3% of PAHs by the plants without N12 inoculation. On day 150, the underground biomass of Fire Phoenix plants grown in soil inoculated with N12 increased 59.40% compared to that without N12 inoculation. The enhanced removal of PAH by Fire Phoenix and N12 was related to the improved rhizosphere microbial activities. However, inoculation of N12 to E. purpurea grown soil did not significantly improve the removal of PAHs and Cd. Our results showed that phytoremediation of PAHs and Cd can be enhanced by a Mycobacterium strain N12, especially when PLFA concentrations of bacteria and fungi exceeded 60% of the initial concentrations, but the enhancement is plant species dependent. (C) 2020 Published by Elsevier B.V.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据