4.7 Article

Saharan sand and dust storms and neonatal mortality: Evidence from Burkina Faso

期刊

SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT
卷 729, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.139053

关键词

Sahran sand and dust storms; PM10; PM2.5; Neonatal mortality; NMMB/BSC Dust model; Burkina Faso

资金

  1. COST Association (European Cooperation in Science and Technology) [CA16202]
  2. AXA Research Fund
  3. Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness [RYC-201518690]
  4. European Research Council (ERC) under the European Union [773051]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

West African populations are exposed to the longest and harshest dust storms on the planet, the Saharan sand and dust storms (SDS). Nonetheless, little is known about the effects of the severe storms on early-life health in West Africa. This study investigated the association of the risk of neonatal mortality, an indicator of the population's early-life health, with potential prenatal and neonatal exposure to the Saharan SDS. Data on 30,552 under-five children from Burkina Faso's 1993, 2003, and 2010 demographic and health surveys were matched to the particulate matters (PM) and terrestrial air temperature and precipitation forecasts. Exposure to dust eventswas measured by the number of dayswith average PM10 and PM2.5 concentrations above a series of threshold. Intensity-dependent patterns of associations between neonatal mortality and both prenatal and birth month exposure to dust events were identified. There was no association if average daily PM10 and PM2.5 levels were <60 and 30 mu g/m(3), respectively. However, strong associations, which increase almost linearly with the intensity of exposure, were identified when daily PM10 and PM2.5 levels ranged from 70 to 150 and from 40 to 70 mu g/m(3), respectively. At the higher PM levels, the association for the gestation period decreased, but that for the birth month remained mostly unresponsive to changes in the PM levels. Larger associations were identified when siblings were compared. (C) 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据