4.7 Article

Survival assessment of simple food webs for dye wastewater after photocatalytic degradation using SnO2/GO nanocomposites under sunlight irradiation

期刊

SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT
卷 721, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.137805

关键词

Photocatalysis; Chlorella pyrenoidosa; Artemia salina; Danio rerio; SnO2/GO; Wastewater

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21876056, 21677054, 21377043]
  2. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2018M630865]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The release of textile effluent into the natural waters poses a serious threat to the aquatic ecosystem. Here, SnO2/GO nanocomposites were synthesized with tunable morphology by the addition of GO with a sonochemical method. The material was characterized using X-ray Diffraction (XRD), scanning electronic microscopy (SEM), Ultraviolet-visible spectroscopy (UV-vis), and infrared spectrometry (IR). The photocatalytic degradation of Rhodamine B (RhB) and textile dye wastewater (TDW) using SnO2/GO nanocomposites was studied under sunlight irradiation. The SnO2/GO nanocomposites exhibited high photocatalytic activity towards the degradation of RhB and TDW with up to 95% removal efficiency. The catalyst dosage, concentration variation, and reusability of the catalyst were also examined to optimize the reaction conditions for the degradation of dye. Bioassays were used to investigate the survival growth rate of simple food webs such as Chlorella pyrenoidosa (CP), Artemia salina (AS) and Danio rerio (DR) in the treated and untreated solution. These simple food web model animals showed good reliability for analyzing the toxicity of the treated and untreated wastewater. Further, histology was analyzed to find out the influence of the dye solution in the animal model. These results suggest that the SnO2/GO nanocomposite shows promising efficiency in the wastewater treatment, which is further confirmed in the toxicity analysis. (C) 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据