4.6 Article

Spatial homogenization of soil-surface pollen assemblages improves the reliability of pollen-climate calibration-set

期刊

SCIENCE CHINA-EARTH SCIENCES
卷 63, 期 11, 页码 1758-1766

出版社

SCIENCE PRESS
DOI: 10.1007/s11430-019-9643-0

关键词

North-central China; Soil-surface pollen; Climate reconstruction; WA-PLS

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41877459, 41630753]
  2. CAS Pioneer Hundred Talents Program
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC)
  4. German Research Foundation (DFG) [41861134030]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

To make a reliable reconstruction of past climate from soil-surface modern pollen, it is necessary to reduce the sources of error. In this paper, pollen percentages of the sub-continental scale modern pollen-climate dataset from China and Mongolia (with 68% soil-surface samples) are homogenized at various spatial scales. A tailored calibration-set is then applied to lake sediment-surface pollen assemblages from north-central China to evaluate their predictive power. Results indicate that spatial homogenization of modern pollen percentages can increase the proportion of inertia explained by climatic variables in CCA and improve the model performance of leave-one-out cross-validation using WA-PLS. Soil-surface pollen assemblages can thus be employed into a calibration-set for reliable climate estimation and they perform better when the calibration-set has been locally homogenized. Small-scale (e.g., radii 2, 5, or 10 km) homogenization reduces the local noise in soil-surface pollen assemblages and improves the cross-validated performance, while broader scale homogenization (more than 20 km radius) blurs the pollen-climate relationship. Lake sediment-surface pollen assemblages from close to the shore could contain pollen grains transported by rivers or from the shore vegetation and thus fail to represent regional climate well like the assemblages from the central part and deep-water area of lake.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据