4.8 Article

Microbiome-derived inosine modulates response to checkpoint inhibitor immunotherapy

期刊

SCIENCE
卷 369, 期 6510, 页码 1481-+

出版社

AMER ASSOC ADVANCEMENT SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1126/science.abc3421

关键词

-

资金

  1. Early Postdoc Mobility Fellowship from the Swiss National Science Foundation
  2. Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) [PJT-165930]
  3. Canadian Foundation for Innovation (CFI) John R. Evans Leaders Fund (JELF) grant
  4. Cumming School of Medicine
  5. Carole May Yates Memorial Endowment for Cancer Research
  6. CIHR [PJT-156073]
  7. CFI-JELF [34986]
  8. International Microbiome Centre (IMC)
  9. Canada Graduate Scholarship from the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC)
  10. Alberta Innovates Translational Health Chair
  11. CIHR grant
  12. Terry Fox Research Institute grant
  13. Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary
  14. Western Economic Diversification (WED)
  15. Alberta Economic Development and Trade (AEDT), Canada

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Several species of intestinal bacteria have been associated with enhanced efficacy of checkpoint blockade immunotherapy, but the underlying mechanisms by which the microbiome enhances antitumor immunity are unclear. In this study, we isolated three bacterial species-Bifidobacterium pseudolongum, Lactobacillus johnsonii, and Olsenella species-that significantly enhanced efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors in four mouse models of cancer. We found that intestinal B. pseudolongum modulated enhanced immunotherapy response through production of the metabolite inosine. Decreased gut barrier function induced by immunotherapy increased systemic translocation of inosine and activated antitumor T cells. The effect of inosine was dependent on T cell expression of the adenosine A2A receptor and required costimulation. Collectively, our study identifies a previously unknown microbial metabolite immune pathway activated by immunotherapy that may be exploited to develop microbial-based adjuvant therapies.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据