4.4 Article

Effectiveness and costs of invasive species control using different techniques to restore cerrado grasslands

期刊

RESTORATION ECOLOGY
卷 29, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/rec.13219

关键词

African grasses; herbicide; indicators; invasion control; prescribed fire; restoration costs; savanna grassland

类别

资金

  1. FundacAo de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado de SAo Paulo-FAPESP [2013/24760-4, 2017/20897-6]
  2. CoordenacAo de Aperfeicoamento de Pessoal de Nivel Superior-CAPES [001]
  3. Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnologico-CNPq [303179/2016-3]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study found that prescribed fire, herbicides, and hoeing were all effective in controlling invasive grasses, with hoeing being the most effective in recovering native vegetation cover and richness. Fire was successful in depleting the seed bank of invasive grasses, while hoeing followed by a grass-selective herbicide was the most cost-effective method for increasing native ground cover.
Invasion by exotic grasses is a severe threat to neotropical grasslands conservation and a major challenge for their restoration. To restore fire-prone cerrado grasslands in southeastern Brazil, which have been massively invaded by the African grassUrochloa decumbens, we tested prescribed fire, herbicides, and hoeing, by themselves or in different combinations. Techniques were compared using ecological indicators (decreasing invasive and increasing native vegetation cover and richness) and cost-effectiveness. All treatments, except fire alone, were similarly effective in controlling the invasive grass, which was reduced to less than 5% cover after 2 years. However, only hoeing was effective in recovering both ground cover and richness of the native vegetation, which was the restoration goal. Despite not changing ground cover by native vegetation or alien grasses, fire was successful as a complementary technique, by depleting the seed bank of the invasive grass by 40%. Hoeing preceded by fire and followed by a grass-selective herbicide was the most cost-effective, requiring US$40 per hectare to increase native ground cover by one percentage point compared to US$93 per hectare if only hoeing. Despite the low cost and efficacy of glyphosate application for controlling the invasive grass, it must be followed by reintroducing the native ground cover through active restoration. If the restoration target is to recover both structure and richness of the native vegetation without planting, hoeing is the best solution to control alien grasses.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据