4.2 Article

Robust requirements gathering for ontologies in smart water systems

期刊

REQUIREMENTS ENGINEERING
卷 26, 期 1, 页码 97-114

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00766-020-00335-z

关键词

Ontology engineering; Smart city; Smart water; Internet of things; Semantic web; Water management

资金

  1. European Commission under the FP7 WISDOM project [619795]
  2. EPSRC (Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council)
  3. BRE (Building Research Establishment)
  4. EPSRC [EP/T019514/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper proposes a methodology to address the sustainability and intelligence challenges of urban environments, successfully applied in the smart water domain to achieve positive results in requirement elicitation, testing, and deployment.
Urban environments are urgently required to become smarter to overcome sustainability and resilience challenges whilst remaining economically viable. This involves a vast increase in the penetration of ICT resources, both physical and virtual, with the requirement to factor in built environment, socio-economic and human artefacts. This paper, therefore, proposes a methodology for eliciting, testing, and deploying, requirements in the field of urban cybernetics. This extends best practice requirements engineering principles to meet the demands of this growing niche. The paper follows a case study approach of applying the methodology in the smart water domain, where it achieves positive results. The approach not only heavily utilises iteration alongside domain experts, but also mandates the integration of technical domain experts to ensure software requirements are met. A key novelty of the approach is prioritising a balance between (a) knowledge engineers' tenacity for logical accuracy, (b) software engineers' need for speed, simplicity, and integration with other components, and (c) the domain experts' needs to invoke ownership and hence nurture adoption of the resulting ontology.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据