4.7 Article

Energy use efficiency of crop residue management for sustainable energy and agriculture conservation in NW India

期刊

RENEWABLE ENERGY
卷 155, 期 -, 页码 1372-1382

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2020.04.046

关键词

Conservation agriculture; Energy; Crop residue management; Maize-wheat cropping system

资金

  1. CGIAR Research Programs (CRPs) on CCAFS and Wheat Agri-Food Systems (WHEAT)
  2. CGIAR Fund Council, Australia (ACIAR)
  3. Irish Aid
  4. European Union
  5. IFAD
  6. USAID

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In the Indo-Gangetic plains of South Asia, the triple challenges of diminishing farm profitability, deteriorating natural resources and energy deficits threaten conventional agricultural sustainability. This threat is intensified by the open field burning of crop residues that not only squander an indirect renewable source of energy but also impair the soil and environment quality. The crop residues can be used as organic manure by retaining the residues as mulch in the field. After a long term (5-yrs) study, it was concluded that crop residues biomass contributed maximum (similar to 79%) in total input energy (1,68,556 MJ ha(-1)) in conservation agriculture (CA) based systems, however fertilizer application (nonrenewable energy source) contributed maximum (similar to 50%) to the total energy (40,636 MJ ha(-1)) in conventional tillage (CT) based maize-wheat cropping system.CA based maize systems recorded higher input energy and energy intensiveness by 23 and 57% respectively, and recorded almost 44% lower energy use efficiency and energy productivity compared to CT based maize systems. On 5 years average basis, Zero tillage based maize-wheat-mungbean with nutrient expert cropping system(ZT/MWMb + NE) utilized 351% more input energy, which resulted in25%higher output energy and 363% higher El compared to CT/MW (40,636 MJ ha(-1), 4,20,197 MJ ha(-1), 39.60 MJ USD-1). (C) 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据