4.7 Article

EEK-SYS: System reliability analysis through estimation error-guided adaptive Kriging approximation of multiple limit state surfaces

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2020.106906

关键词

System reliability analysis; Real-time estimation error; Wrong state classification; Adaptive Kriging; Multiple failure modes

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51675198]
  2. National Defense Pre-Research Foundation of China [41423010205]
  3. National Science Foundation for Distinguished Young Scholars of China [51825502]
  4. Program for HUST Academic Frontier Youth Team [2017QYTD04]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In order to approximate the multiple limit state functions for different failure events, the active learning Kriging model proposed for component reliability analysis has been extended to system reliability analysis. Meanwhile, many efficient sampling strategies have been applied to reduce the high computational burden. However, these strategies meet a challenge in wasting some training points and terminating the training process inappropriately, since they do not directly relate to the estimation error of system failure probability. To address the challenge, this work proposes an estimation error-guided adaptive Kriging method. As Kriging prediction may be inaccurate before being well trained, the predicted system failure probability may deviate from the true result. To quantify this estimation error, the true number of failure points is approximated by adding the number of predicted failure points and the number of wrongly classified points. Since it is impossible to learn the exact number of wrongly classified points, its confidence interval is derived based on the probability of making wrong state classification. Subsequently, the refinement of Kriging is achieved by using the probability to identify new points and using the estimation error to determine the termination, which has been demonstrated by three different cases.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据