4.5 Article

Clinical relevance of the utilization of vital Lugol's iodine staining in detection and diagnosis of oral cancer and dysplasia

期刊

CLINICAL ORAL INVESTIGATIONS
卷 21, 期 2, 页码 589-595

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s00784-016-1925-x

关键词

Lugol's iodine; Squamous cell carcinoma; Dysplasia; Oral

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The aim of this study is to assess the clinical relevance of the utilization of vital Lugol's iodine staining in detection of oral cancer and dysplastic lesions as well as demarcation of the extent of these lesions. A prospective, cross-sectional, hospital-based study was performed in Khartoum Teaching Dental Hospital, Sudan. Suspicious oral epithelial lesions indicating incisional biopsy were stained with 10 % Lugol's iodine solution and were clinically designated as negative for dysplasia or neoplasia when no unstained lesion (USL) area was observed, or as positive when a USL area is observed. Incisional biopsies involving both the unstained portion and the stained portion were obtained and histologically evaluated for definitive diagnosis. Forty-five biopsies were obtained from 28 patients. Histopathological examination of the specimens confirmed some degree of dysplasia or neoplasia in all clinically positive specimens with oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) being the most common definitive diagnosis (17 patients, 60.7 %). Clinical relevance level of vital Lugol's iodine staining in detecting oral cancer and dysplasia was found to be 90.9 % (SE = 0.05, P = 0.05). The findings of this study showed that Lugol's iodine is an easy, safe, and effective method of visualizing oral epithelial lesions and differentiating epithelial carcinoma and dysplasia from other benign mucosal lesions. Despite certain limitations, its use is of great value in detection and diagnosis of oral cancer and dysplasia. Lugol's iodine staining can effectively be used in detection of the dysplastic and malignant superficial lesions of the oral epithelium.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据