4.5 Article

Predicting population extinction in lattice-based birth-death-movement models

出版社

ROYAL SOC
DOI: 10.1098/rspa.2020.0089

关键词

random walk; continuum limit; extinction; diffusion; mathematical modelling; population dynamics

资金

  1. Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence in Convergent Bio-Nano Science and Technology [CE140100036]
  2. Australian Research Council [DP170100474, DE200100988]
  3. Australian Research Council [DE200100988] Funding Source: Australian Research Council

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The question of whether a population will persist or go extinct is of key interest throughout ecology and biology. Various mathematical techniques allow us to generate knowledge regarding individual behaviour, which can be analysed to obtain predictions about the ultimate survival or extinction of the population. A common model employed to describe population dynamics is the lattice-based random walk model with crowding (exclusion). This model can incorporate behaviour such as birth, death and movement, while including natural phenomena such as finite size effects. Performing sufficiently many realizations of the random walk model to extract representative population behaviour is computationally intensive. Therefore, continuum approximations of random walk models are routinely employed. However, standard continuum approximations are notoriously incapable of making accurate predictions about population extinction. Here, we develop a new continuum approximation, the state-space diffusion approximation, which explicitly accounts for population extinction. Predictions from our approximation faithfully capture the behaviour in the random walk model, and provides additional information compared to standard approximations. We examine the influence of the number of lattice sites and initial number of individuals on the long-term population behaviour, and demonstrate the reduction in computation time between the random walk model and our approximation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据