4.8 Article

Enhanced receptor binding of SARS-CoV-2 through networks of hydrogen-bonding and interactions

出版社

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2008209117

关键词

protein-protein interaction; SARS-CoV-2; relative free energy of binding; molecular dynamics

资金

  1. Shenzhen Municipal Science and Technology Innovation Commission [KQTD2017-0330155106581]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21533003]
  3. National Institutes of Health [GM46736]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Molecular dynamics and free energy simulations have been carried out to elucidate the structural origin of differential protein-protein interactions between the common receptor protein angiotensin converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) and the receptor binding domains of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) [A. E. Gorbalenya et al., Nat. Microbiol. 5, 536-544 (2020)] that causes coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) [P. Zhou et al., Nature 579, 270-273 (2020)] and the SARS coronavirus in the 2002-2003 (SARS-CoV) [T. Kuiken et al., Lancet 362, 263-270 (2003)] outbreak. Analysis of the dynamic trajectories reveals that the binding interface consists of a primarily hydrophobic region and a delicate hydrogen-bonding network in the 2019 novel coronavirus. A key mutation from a hydrophobic residue in the SARSCoV sequence to Lys417 in SARS-CoV-2 creates a salt bridge across the central hydrophobic contact region, which along with polar residue mutations results in greater electrostatic complementarity than that of the SARS-CoV complex. Furthermore, both electrostatic effects and enhanced hydrophobic packing due to removal of four out of five proline residues in a short 12-residue loop lead to conformation shift toward a more tilted binding groove in the complex in comparison with the SARS-CoV complex. On the other hand, hydrophobic contacts in the complex of the SARSCoV-neutralizing antibody 80R are disrupted in the SARS-CoV-2 homology complex model, which is attributed to failure of recognition of SARS-CoV-2 by 80R.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据