4.8 Article

Epigenetic competition reveals density -dependent regulation and target site plasticity of phosphorothioate epigenetics in bacteria

出版社

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2002933117

关键词

epigenetics; DNA modification; ChIP-seq; DNA target selection; restriction-modification

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31720103906, 31925002]
  2. China National Key Research and Development Program [2019YFA0904300]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities of China
  4. SMART Antimicrobial Resistance Interdisciplinary Research Group - National Research Foundation of Singapore
  5. US National Science Foundation [CHE-1709364]
  6. NIH [R35GM130376]
  7. China Scholarship Council [201606270163]
  8. University of Southern California-Taiwan Postdoctoral Fellowship

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Phosphorothioate (PT) DNA modifications-in which a nonbonding phosphate oxygen is replaced with sulfur-represent a widespread, horizontally transferred epigenetic system in prokaryotes and have a highly unusual property of occupying only a small fraction of available consensus sequences in a genome. Using Salmonella enterica as a model, we asked a question of fundamental importance: How do the PT-modifying DndA-E proteins select their GPSAAC/GPSTTC targets? Here, we applied innovative analytical, sequencing, and computational tools to discover a novel behavior for DNA-binding proteins: The Dnd proteins are parked at the G6mATC Dam methyltransferase consensus sequence instead of the expected GAAC/GTTC motif, with removal of the 6mA permitting extensive PT modification of GATC sites. This shift in modification sites further revealed a surprising constancy in the density of PT modifications across the genome. Computational analysis showed that GAAC, GTTC, and GATC share common features of DNA shape, which suggests that PT epigenetics are regulated in a densitydependent manner partly by DNA shape-driven target selection in the genome.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据