4.6 Article

Limit conditions of smoldering spread in counterflow configuration: Extinction and smoldering-to-flaming transition

期刊

PROCEEDINGS OF THE COMBUSTION INSTITUTE
卷 38, 期 3, 页码 5005-5013

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.proci.2020.05.002

关键词

Smoldering spread; Tsuji-Yamaoka configuration; Extinction; Smoldering-to-flaming transition (SFT); 1-D model

资金

  1. Dr. Yoshikazu Uchida Memorial Grant of Japan Association for Fire Science and Engineering
  2. JSPS KAKENHI Grant [18H01665]
  3. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [18H01665] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigates the limit conditions for smoldering combustion of biomass fuel through experimental and theoretical research, finding that oxygen content affects the smoldering spread rate and maximum temperature. Predictions of the smoldering-to-flaming transition limit conditions were made using a one-dimensional model.
This paper presents an experimental and theoretical study on limit conditions for smoldering combustion of biomass fuel. A fuel rod was burned in an oxidizer flow in a Tsuji-Yamaoka type, counterflow configuration, and the spread rate and temperature distribution were measured. The spread rate and maximum temperature increased with an increase in oxygen mass fraction in the oxidizer flow. Smoldering spread was not possible when the oxygen mass fraction was below a lower critical value, whereas a smoldering-to-flaming transition (SFT) occurred when the mass fraction was above an upper critical value. A one-dimensional model was then developed based on experimental observations to describe steady smoldering spread. The limit conditions were predicted by assessing the existence of solution. It was found that extinction occurs due to finiteness of char-oxidation rate, while the SFT limit can be predicted by considering gas-phase combustion of pyrolysis products. ? 2020 The Combustion Institute. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据