4.6 Article

Report from the conference, 'identifying obstacles to applying big data in agriculture'

期刊

PRECISION AGRICULTURE
卷 22, 期 1, 页码 306-315

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11119-020-09738-y

关键词

Automation; Big data; Farm profitability; Food security

资金

  1. United States Department of Agriculture-National Institute of Food and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Cyberinformatics and Tools (USDA NIFA FACT) [2018-67021-28692]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Data-centric technology has the potential to be applied in agriculture but is not widely adopted currently. Participants at the conference discussed the obstacles and potential solutions for applying Big Data in agriculture.
Data-centric technology has not undergone widespread adoption in production agriculture but could address global needs for food security and farm profitability. Participants in the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) National Institute for Food and Agriculture (NIFA) funded conference, Identifying Obstacles to Applying Big Data in Agriculture, held in Houston, TX, in August 2018, defined detailed scenarios in which on-farm decisions could benefit from the application of Big Data. The participants came from multiple academic fields, agricultural industries and government organizations and, in addition to defining the scenarios, they identified obstacles to implementing Big Data in these scenarios as well as potential solutions. This communication is a report on the conference and its outcomes. Two scenarios are included to represent the overall key findings in commonly identified obstacles and solutions: In-season yield prediction for real-time decision-making, and Sow lameness. Common obstacles identified at the conference included error in the data, inaccessibility of the data, unusability of the data, incompatibility of data generation and processing systems, the inconvenience of handling the data, the lack of a clear return on investment (ROI) and unclear ownership. Less common but valuable solutions to common obstacles are also noted.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据