4.5 Article

Towards resolving the 'jigsaw puzzle' and age-fossil inconsistency within East Gondwana

期刊

PRECAMBRIAN RESEARCH
卷 345, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.precamres.2020.105775

关键词

Detrital zircon; U-Pb ages; India; Australia; Supercontinent; Age of fossils

资金

  1. National Science of Foundation of China [41673016, 41630211, 41890831]
  2. State Key Laboratory of Palaeobiology and Stratigraphy, Nanjing Institute of Geology and Palaeontology, Chinese Academy of Sciences [193112]
  3. State Key Laboratory of Geological Processes and Mineral Resources, China University of Geosciences [GPMR201902]
  4. RUSA 2.0 grant of Jadavpur University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Lack of high quality zircon U-Pb age data has hampered us from ascertaining the relative positions of various continental blocks within East Gondwana, which also resulted in age-fossil inconsistencies in the Neoproterozoic successions particularly within India Peninsular region. By means of analyzing detrital zircons from the Neoproterozoic sedimentary rocks of Peninsular India and NW Australia, we found similar age spectra among NW India, Himalaya, NW Australia and Cathaysia Block that are indications of their proximity with each other. A scenario can be envisaged that following delivery of detritus (1.3-1.1 Ga) to northern India during early to middle Ediacaran Period, South China together with Australia probably clockwise rotated during late Ediacaran to Cambrian Period which prompted South China to receive detritus (1.3-1.1 Ga) from Western and northwestern Australia. New radiometric dates suggest an Ediacaran age for the Marwar and Bhander groups, thus confirming previous biostratigraphic correlations among the Marwar, Kurnool, Bhima and Bhander Groups. Given their diverse age spectra, the Maihar Sandstone and the Sonia Sandstone were possibly deposited in different time intervals/slices. Uncertainties in obtaining the youngest age of detrital zircons mean care must be taken when using detrital zircon age for tectonic regime classification.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据