4.7 Article

Efficacy of hybrid nano-powder presence on the thermal conductivity of the engine oil: An experimental study

期刊

POWDER TECHNOLOGY
卷 369, 期 -, 页码 261-269

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.powtec.2020.05.004

关键词

Hybrid Nanolluid; MWCNT-Al2O3; Engine oil (10 W40); Thermal conductivity

资金

  1. Key project of the National Social Science Fundation of the year 2018 [18AJY013]
  2. 2017 National Social Science foundation project [17CJY072]
  3. 2018 planning project of philosophy and social science of zhejiang province [18NDJC086YB]
  4. 2018 Fujian Social Science Planning Project [FJ2018B067]
  5. Planning Fund Project of Humanities and Social Sciences Research of the Ministry of Education in 2019 [19YJA790102]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigated the Al2O3-MWCNT presence efficacy on the thermal conductivity of the engine oil (10 W40) base fluid. Owing to the dependency of thermal conductivity on temperature and number of nanoparticles, the experimental measurements were conducted at 25-65 degrees C and volume fraction of 0.05, 0.1, 0.25, 0.5 and 1 vol %. Also, zeta potential test was performed at two different times to verify the long-term stability. Based on experiment results, at constant temperature gradient, the oil's ability to conduct heat at 65 degrees C is about 4.4% lower than that of 25 degrees C. But the addition of nanoparticles of Al2O3-MWCNT by 1 vol% into the oil augmented the heat transfer potential by 9.62%. It was found that the positive effects of adding nanoparticles of MWCNT-Al2O3 to engine oil (10 W40) on thermal conductivity enhancement were amplified at higher temperatures. Due to the incorporation of MWCNT-Al2O3 into oil, thermal conductivity enhanced up to 30.53%. Finally, through approving a regression-based correlation, Al2O3-MWCNT/engine oil (10 W40) thermal conductivity was predicted and applying analysis of variance, the thermal conductivity dependency to volume fraction and temperature were examined. (C) 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据