4.5 Article

Parts-per-million polyhedral oligomeric silsesquioxane loading induced mechanical reinforcement in polyethylene nanocomposites. When small and well-dispersed yields big

期刊

POLYMERS FOR ADVANCED TECHNOLOGIES
卷 31, 期 11, 页码 2453-2465

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/pat.4961

关键词

mechanical properties; microstructure; nanocomposites; polyethylene; POSS

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The expectation that composites fabricated with nanoscale reinforcing materials will exhibit exceptional mechanical properties remains to be fulfilled. Here, octaisobutyl-polyhedral oligomeric silsesquioxane (buPOSS) nanochemical was melt blended with low-density/linear low-density polyethylene (LDPE/LLDPE) to form nanostructured films. We demonstrate that buPOSS concentrations of only 80 to 400 parts-per-million (ppm) are enough to produce nearly 2-fold increase of the film's tensile Young's modulus,E-MD. Strikingly, there was no penalty on strain at fracture epsilon(f,MD), as usually seen in reinforced (nano) composites, rather epsilon(f,MD)increased with buPOSS content. Furthermore, other important mechanical properties like toughness, yield stress, tear resistance, and dart impact strength were also an increasing function of buPOSS content. The dispersion of buPOSS into the polyethylene matrix at nearly single cage unit is the key to mechanical reinforcement. The buPOSS sizeD, smaller than the virtual tube diameterd(t)defined by Doi and Edwards, indicate that buPOSS is capable to intercalate the entangled macromolecules and mechanically reinforce without acting as stress concentrators. Furthermore, the entanglement intercalation and consequent reduction of free volume induced reduction of oxygen transmission (OTR) through the films and the barrier properties were intact after 18 months aging at room temperature. The nanosized and efficient dispersion of buPOSS is key to the mechanical reinforcement at only ppm loading and these results add a new paradigm to polymer nanocomposites formulation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据