4.5 Article

Electrical conductivity and electromagnetic interference shielding effectiveness of nano-structured carbon assisted poly(methyl methacrylate) nanocomposites

期刊

POLYMER ENGINEERING AND SCIENCE
卷 60, 期 10, 页码 2414-2427

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/pen.25480

关键词

carbon black; electrical conductivity; electromagnetic interference shielding; flexural properties; low percolation threshold

资金

  1. SERB-DST [ECR/2016/000048]
  2. National Research Foundation of Korea [NRF-2016R1D1A3B03932709]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Nanostructured carbon-based polymeric nanocomposites are gaining research interest because of their cost-effectiveness, lightweight, and robust electromagnetic interference (EMI) shielding performance. Till now, it is a great challenge to design and fabricate highly scalable, cost-effective nanocomposites with superior EMI shielding performance. Herein, highly scalable EMI shielding material with tunable absorbing behaviors comprising of low-budget ketjen black (K-CB) reinforced poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) nanocomposites have been prepared using simple solvent assisted solution mixing technique followed by hot compression technique. The morphological investigation revealed the homogeneous distribution of K-CB and strong interfacial interaction in PMMA matrix, which validated the strong reinforcement and other intriguing properties of the nanocomposites. The PMMA nanocomposites showed a low percolation threshold (2.79 wt%) and excellent electrical conductivity due to the formation of 3D conductive network like architecture within the polymer matrix. Specifically, the 10 wt% K-CB nanocomposite possessed a superior EMI shielding performance of about 28 dB for X-band frequency range. Further, a huge change in EMI shielding performance of PMMA nanocomposites is observed with varying thickness. The brand new K-CB decorated PMMA nanocomposites are expected to open the door for next-generation cost-effective EMI shielding materials for academic and industrial applications.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据