4.7 Article

Structure-property relationship of low dielectric constant polyimide fibers containing fluorine groups

期刊

POLYMER
卷 206, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.polymer.2020.122884

关键词

Polyimide fibers; Microstructure; Dielectric properties

资金

  1. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2017YFB0307600]
  2. Aeronautical Science Foundation of China [201718S9001]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [XK1802-2]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A series of copolyimide (co-PI) fibers with low dielectric constants and excellent comprehensive properties have been successfully prepared via a two-step wet-spinning method by incorporating 2,2'-bis(trifluoromethyl)-4,4'-diaminobiphenyl (TFMB) into rigid polymer backbones of 3,3',4,4'-biphenyltetracarboxylic dianhydride (BPDA)/p-phenylenediamine (p-PDA). The dielectric constant of PI fibers were substantially reduced from 3.0 to 2.48 at the frequency of 10 GHz after the introduction of trifluoromethyl (-CF3) groups. Meanwhile, the prepared PI fibers exhibited high thermal stability as well as excellent mechanical properties. The co-PI fibers possessed the optimum tensile strength of 1.4 GPa and modulus of 83.3 GPa at the p-PDA/TFMB molar ratio of 7/3. The 5% weight loss temperature in nitrogen ranged from 523 to 558 degrees C, and the glass transition temperature decreased from 372 degrees C to 295 degrees C with increasing TFMB contents. Both experimental and molecular simulations method were adopted to discuss the influence of fluorine group on the aggregation structure and properties of PI fibers, suggesting that the improved free volume were the crucial factor responsible for low dielectric constant. The molecular ordered degree and orientation degree of co-PI fibers decreased firstly and further increased with increasing TMFB content, which is due to the combined effects of large free volume of trifluoromethyl and polymer regularity variation caused by copolymerization.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据