4.6 Article

Impact and prognosis of the expression of IFN-alpha among tuberculosis patients

期刊

PLOS ONE
卷 15, 期 7, 页码 -

出版社

PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0235488

关键词

-

资金

  1. Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR), Government of India
  2. ICMR [2013-0063]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Mycobacterium tuberculosis (M.tb) infection stimulates the release of cytokines, including interferons (IFNs). IFNs are initiators, regulators, and effectors of innate and adaptive immunity. Accordingly, the expression levels of Type I (alpha, beta) and II (gamma) IFNs, among untreated tuberculosis (TB) patients and household contacts (HHC) clinically free of TB was assessed. A total of 264 individuals (TB patients-123; HHC-86; laboratory volunteers-55; Treated TB patients-36) were enrolled for this study. IFN-alpha mRNA expression levels predominated compared to IFN-gamma and IFN-beta among untreated TB patients. IFN-alpha transcripts were similar to 3.5 folds higher in TB patients compared to HHC, (p<0.0001). High expression of IFN-alpha was seen among 46% (56/123) of the TB patients and 26%, (22/86) of HHCs. The expression levels of IFN-alpha correlated with that of IFN transcriptional release factor 7 (IRF) (p<0.0001). In contrast, an inverse relationship exists between PGE2 and IFN-alpha expression levels; high IFN-alpha expressers were associated with low levels of PGE2 and vice-versa (Spearman's rho = -0.563; p<0.0001). In-vitro, IFN-alpha failed to restrict the replication of intracellular M.tb. The anti-mycobacterial activity of IFN-gamma was compromised in the presence of IFN-alpha, but not by IFN-beta. The expression of IFN-alpha and beta diminished or is absent, among successfully treated TB patients. These observations suggest the utility of assessment of Type I IFNs expression levels as a prognostic marker to monitor tuberculosis patient response to chemotherapy because changes in Type I IFNs expression are expected to precede the clearance and /reduction in bacterial load.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据