4.6 Article

Development of support vector machine-based model and comparative analysis with artificial neural network for modeling the plant tissue culture procedures: effect of plant growth regulators on somatic embryogenesis of chrysanthemum, as a case study

期刊

PLANT METHODS
卷 16, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s13007-020-00655-9

关键词

Artificial intelligence; Support vector regression; Multi-objective optimization algorithm; Machine learning algorithms; Multilayer perceptron; Somatic embryogenesis; Chrysanthemum; Nitric oxide

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background Optimizing the somatic embryogenesis protocol can be considered as the first and foremost step in successful gene transformation studies. However, it is usually difficult to achieve an optimized embryogenesis protocol due to the cost and time-consuming as well as the complexity of this process. Therefore, it is necessary to use a novel computational approach, such as machine learning algorithms for this aim. In the present study, two machine learning algorithms, including Multilayer Perceptron (MLP) as an artificial neural network (ANN) and support vector regression (SVR), were employed to model somatic embryogenesis of chrysanthemum, as a case study, and compare their prediction accuracy. Results The results showed that SVR (R-2 > 0.92) had better performance accuracy than MLP (R-2 > 0.82). Moreover, the Non-dominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm-II (NSGA-II) was also applied for the optimization of the somatic embryogenesis and the results showed that the highest embryogenesis rate (99.09%) and the maximum number of somatic embryos per explant (56.24) can be obtained from a medium containing 9.10 mu M 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4-D), 4.70 mu M kinetin (KIN), and 18.73 mu M sodium nitroprusside (SNP). According to our results, SVR-NSGA-II was able to optimize the chrysanthemum's somatic embryogenesis accurately. Conclusions SVR-NSGA-II can be employed as a reliable and applicable computational methodology in future plant tissue culture studies.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据