4.7 Article

Divergence of defensive cucurbitacins in independentCucurbita pepodomestication events leads to differences in specialist herbivore preference

期刊

PLANT CELL AND ENVIRONMENT
卷 43, 期 11, 页码 2812-2825

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/pce.13844

关键词

Acalymma vittatum; plant-herbivore interactions; squash; secondary metabolite; terpenoid

资金

  1. National Institute of Food and Agriculture [1008470]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Crop domestication and improvement often concurrently affect plant resistance to pests and production of secondary metabolites, creating challenges for isolating the ecological implications of selection for specific metabolites. Cucurbitacins are bitter triterpenoids with extreme phenotypic differences between Cucurbitaceae lineages, yet we lack integrated models of herbivore preference, cucurbitacin accumulation, and underlying genetic mechanisms. InCucurbita pepo, we dissected the effect of cotyledon cucurbitacins on preference of a specialist insect pest (Acalymma vittatum) for multiple tissues, assessed genetic loci underlying cucurbitacin accumulation in diverse germplasm and a biparentalF(2)population (from a cross between two independent domesticates), and characterized quantitative associations between gene expression and metabolites during seedling development.Acalymma vittatumaffinity for cotyledons is mediated by cucurbitacins, but other traits contribute to whole-plant resistance. Cotyledon cucurbitacin accumulation was associated with population structure, and our genetic mapping identified a single locus,Bi-4, containing genes relevant to transport and regulation - not biosynthesis - that diverged between lineages. These candidate genes were expressed during seedling development, most prominently a putative secondary metabolite transporter. Taken together, these findings support the testable hypothesis that breeding for plant resistance to insects involves targeting genes for regulation and transport of defensive metabolites, in addition to core biosynthesis genes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据