4.7 Article

Both the contribution of soil nitrogen and of biological N2 fixation to sugarcane can increase with the inoculation of diazotrophic bacteria

期刊

PLANT AND SOIL
卷 454, 期 1-2, 页码 155-169

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11104-020-04621-1

关键词

N-15 natural abundance; Bacterial inoculant; Biological N(2)fixation; Sugarcane; Plant growth promotion

资金

  1. Embrapa
  2. National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq) [INCT 465133/2014-2]
  3. Newton Fund [B/N012476/1]
  4. UK Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC)
  5. Brazilian National Council for State Funding Agencies (CONFAP)
  6. CAPES (Ministry of Education)
  7. program Cientista de Nosso Estado from the Carlos Chagas Rio State Research Foundation (FAPERJ)
  8. CNPq

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Aims This study was performed to determine if the contribution of biological N(2)fixation (BNF) associated with Brazilian sugarcane cultivars could be increased by the inoculation with N-2-fixing bacteria. Methods The field experiment was planted with two sugarcane cultivars, inoculated or not, with five N-2-fixing bacteria. All plant tissues, including belowground, were harvested for determination of dry matter, N accumulation and(15)N abundance at five occasions until 450 days after planting. Results Inoculation significantly increased total N accumulation in the aerial tissue of cultivar RB867515 from 147 to 199 kg N ha(-1)and cultivar RB92579 from 126 to 192 N kg ha(-1). At final harvest(15)N abundances of entire sugarcane plants compared to that of plant-available N indicated that BNF inputs were over 64%. Total N derived from BNF and the soil was increased by inoculation, by 50 and 17 kg N ha(-1)and 36 and 67 kg N ha(-1), for the two cultivars respectively. Conclusions Without inoculation, the two sugarcane cultivars obtained over 65% of N from BNF. Inoculation with the five component inoculant increased N accumulation from soil and BNF but with little impact on the proportion of N derived from BNF.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据