4.6 Article

Role of the splicing factor SRSF4 in cisplatin-induced modifications of pre-mRNA splicing and apoptosis

期刊

BMC CANCER
卷 15, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s12885-015-1259-0

关键词

Cancer therapy; Alternative splicing; PI3K; Apoptosis; Drug efficiency; Cisplatin; SRSF4

类别

资金

  1. National Fund for Scientific Research, Belgium (F.N.R.S-Televie) [7.4634.10]
  2. Belspo
  3. Research Concerted Action [ARC 10/15-02]
  4. Fonds Leon Fredericq of the University of Liege, Belgium
  5. Canadian Institutes of Health Research [MOP136948]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Modification of splicing by chemotherapeutic drugs has usually been evaluated on a limited number of pre-mRNAs selected for their recognized or potential importance in cell proliferation or apoptosis. However, the pathways linking splicing alterations to the efficiency of cancer therapy remain unclear. Methods: Next-generation sequencing was used to analyse the transcriptome of breast carcinoma cells treated by cisplatin. Pharmacological inhibitors, RNA interference, cells deficient in specific signalling pathways, RT-PCR and FACS analysis were used to investigate how the anti-cancer drug cisplatin affected alternative splicing and the cell death pathway. Results: We identified 717 splicing events affected by cisplatin, including 245 events involving cassette exons. Gene ontology analysis indicates that cell cycle, mRNA processing and pre-mRNA splicing were the main pathways affected. Importantly, the cisplatin-induced splicing alterations required class I PI3Ks P110 beta but not components such as ATM, ATR and p53 that are involved in the DNA damage response. The siRNA-mediated depletion of the splicing regulator SRSF4, but not SRSF6, expression abrogated many of the splicing alterations as well as cell death induced by cisplatin. Conclusion: Many of the splicing alterations induced by cisplatin are caused by SRSF4 and they contribute to apoptosis in a process requires class I PI3K.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据