4.6 Article

Exploring the behavioral risk chains of accidents using complex network theory in the construction industry

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.physa.2020.125012

关键词

Behavioral risk chain; Unsafe behavior; Accident prevention; Complex network; Building construction

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [71801197, 71874165]
  2. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities, China University of Geosciences (Wuhan) [170649, CUGQY1941]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Accident causation theories explain the possible causation mechanisms of accidents, and unsafe behavior is a major component of such causes. Considering the limitation that existing studies rarely discuss the interactions among unsafe behaviors in accidents, this paper uses a case study in the Chinese building construction industry to explore the behavioral risk chains of accidents based on complex network (CN) theory. First, accident cases are collected from government websites, and the extracted unsafe acts are classified according to a list summarized based on several safety standards and operating procedures. Second, the rules for forming behavioral risk chains are defined, and then, a behavioral risk chain network of accidents (BRCNA) is established. In addition, Pajek is used to construct the network model. Finally, the topological parameters are calculated and analyzed in the BRCNA. The results show that the BRCNA has the properties of a scale-free and small-world network. These findings indicate the robustness of the BRCNA for random attacks and the high transmission and diffusion efficiency of behavioral risk in the BRCNA, which reflects that some unsafe acts must be critically controlled and that their related unsafe acts in a chain must be collaboratively controlled through safety management. This study is of theoretical and practical significance for accident prevention in the construction industry. (c) 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据