4.6 Article

Hepcidin is a relevant iron status indicator in infancy: results from a randomized trial of early vs. delayed cord clamping

期刊

PEDIATRIC RESEARCH
卷 89, 期 5, 页码 1216-1221

出版社

SPRINGERNATURE
DOI: 10.1038/s41390-020-1045-9

关键词

-

资金

  1. Swedish Research Council
  2. Vetenskapsradet [2019-01005]
  3. Knut and Alice Wallenberg foundation
  4. Vasterbotten County Council
  5. Swedish Research Council [2019-01005] Funding Source: Swedish Research Council

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study demonstrates that serum hepcidin is a relevant indicator of iron status in early infancy and can be used to detect iron deficiency.
Background We aimed to evaluate whether serum hepcidin is a useful indicator of iron status in infants. Methods Term infants (n = 400) were randomized to delayed (>= 180 s) or early (<= 10 s) cord clamping (CC). Iron status was assessed at 4 and 12 months. In all cases with iron depletion or iron deficiency (ID) (as defined in Methods)(n = 30) and 97 randomly selected iron-replete infants, we analyzed hepcidin and explored its correlation to the intervention, iron status, and perinatal factors. Results Serum hepcidin concentrations were significantly lower in the early CC group at both time points and in ID infants at 4 months. Median (2.5th-97.5th percentile) hepcidin in non-ID infants in the delayed CC group (suggested reference) was 64.5 (10.9-142.1), 39.5 (3.5-157.7), and 32.9 (11.2-124.2) ng/mL in the cord blood and at 4 and 12 months, respectively. The value of 16 ng/mL was a threshold detecting all cases of iron depletion/ID at 4 months. No similar threshold for ID was observed at 12 months. The strongest predictor of hepcidin at both ages was ferritin. Conclusions Hepcidin is relevant as iron status indicator in early infancy and may be useful to detect ID. Levels Impact Serum hepcidin is a relevant indicator of iron status in early infancy. Normal reference in healthy infants is suggested in this study. Serum hepcidin may be useful in clinical practice to detect iron deficiency.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据