4.3 Article

Parasitological and immunological evaluation of a novel chemotherapeutic agent against visceral leishmaniasis

期刊

PARASITE IMMUNOLOGY
卷 42, 期 12, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/pim.12784

关键词

delivery systems; flavonoids; immune response; leishmaniasis; miltefosine; treatment

资金

  1. Coordenacao de Aperfeicoamento de Pessoal de Nivel Superior (CAPES)
  2. Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnologico (CNPq)
  3. Fundacao de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado de Minas Gerais (FAPEMIG)
  4. MRC [MR/R005850/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Aims Treatment for visceral leishmaniasis (VL) is hampered by the toxicity and/or high cost of drugs, as well as by emergence of parasite resistance. Therefore, there is an urgent need for new antileishmanial agents. Methods and Results In this study, the antileishmanial activity of a diprenylated flavonoid called 5,7,3,4'-tetrahydroxy-6,8-diprenylisoflavone (CMt) was tested againstLeishmania infantumandL amazonensisspecies. Results showed that CMt presented selectivity index (SI) of 70.0 and 165.0 againstL infantumandL amazonensispromastigotes, respectively, and of 181.9 and 397.8 against respective axenic amastigotes. Amphotericin B (AmpB) showed lower SI values of 9.1 and 11.1 againstL infantumandL amazonensispromastigotes, respectively, and of 12.5 and 14.3 against amastigotes, respectively. CMt was effective in the treatment of infected macrophages and caused alterations in the parasite mitochondria.L infantum-infected mice treated with miltefosine, CMt alone or incorporated in polymeric micelles (CMt/Mic) presented significant reductions in the parasite load in distinct organs, when compared to the control groups. An antileishmanial Th1-type cellular and humoral immune response were developed one and 15 days after treatment, with CMt/Mic-treated mice presenting a better protective response. Conclusion Our data suggest that CMt/Mic could be evaluated as a chemotherapeutic agent against VL.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据