4.6 Article

Dietary fat and male sex increase histopathological changes in a mouse model of oral cancer

期刊

ORAL DISEASES
卷 27, 期 2, 页码 215-225

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/odi.13542

关键词

4-Nitroquinoline-1-oxide; high-fat diet; mouse model; oral cancer; oral squamous cell carcinoma

资金

  1. Midwestern University College of Graduate Studies
  2. College of Dental Medicine

向作者/读者索取更多资源

High-fat diet and male sex worsen the pathology of 4-nitroquinoline-1-oxide-induced oral cancer, with elevated lymphoid cell infiltration contributing to disease progression.
Objective To compare the effects of dietary fat and sex on murine oral squamous cell carcinoma pathology. Materials and methods Male and female C57Bl/6 mice (36/sex) received a low-fat (10 kcal%) or high-fat (60 kcal%) diet. Water (control), vehicle, or 4-nitroquinoline-1-oxide in vehicle (50 mu g/ml) was provided for 17 weeks followed by six additional weeks of water. Oral lesion development was recorded weekly. Histopathologic changes in tongues were examined, and T cells (CD3+), macrophages (CD68+), and neutrophils (Ly6+) were quantified. Results All 4-nitroquinoline-1-oxide-treated mice developed oral tumors. High-fat diet exacerbated pathology, demonstrated by an increased final tumor burden (10.9 +/- 4.5 vs. 7.9 +/- 2.5, mm/mouse,p < .05; high-fat diet vs. low-fat diet, respectively), and a greater histopathology score. When dietary groups were combined, 4-nitroquinoline-1-oxide-treated males displayed higher histopathology scores than females (4.2 +/- 0.3 vs. 3.6 +/- 0.2, respectively,p < .05). Lymphoid cell infiltration was greater in the 4-nitroquinoline-1-oxide mouse tongues than controls: T cells (14.0 vs. 0.96 cells/mm(2)), macrophages (3.6 vs. 1.8 cells/mm(2)), and neutrophils (12.0 vs. 0.38 cells/mm(2)). Conclusion High-fat diet and male sex increased the pathology of 4-nitroquinoline-1-oxide-induced oral cancer. Elevated lymphoid cell infiltration contributed to disease pathology.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据