4.7 Article

Influence of surface plasmon resonance of Ag nanoparticles on photoluminescence of Ho3+ ions in magnesium-zinc-sulfophosphate glass system

期刊

OPTICS AND LASER TECHNOLOGY
卷 126, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.optlastec.2020.106134

关键词

Holmium ions; Ag NPs; Localized surface plasmon resonance; Judd-Ofelt parameters

资金

  1. UTM
  2. Ministry of Higher Education, Malaysia (MoHE) [FRGS: 5F050, GUP: 18H68, GUP: 18H90, UTMFR: 20H65, TDR: 06G83]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Two series of magnesium-zinc-sulfophosphate glasses with the high (Series 1) and low (Series 2) doping levels of Ho3+ under varying Ag nanoparticles (Ag NPs) contents were prepared using the melt-quenching method and characterized. The XRD pattern of the as-quenched samples verified their glassy nature. The TEM image revealed the existence of Ag nanocrystallites of diameter approximate to 4.93 nm with (422) lattice plane orientation inside the glass matrix. The LSPR absorption band of Ag NPs was probed at 408 nm. Absorption spectra of glasses consisted of twelve significant bands wherein I-5(8) -> (5)G(6) transition in Ho3+ disclosed the highest intensity. The optical band gap energies of glasses were increased with the rise in Ag NPs contents. The nephelauxetic ratio of both glass series displayed the ionic character of Ho3+ bond with surrounding ligands. The oscillator strength and intensity parameters (Omega(2), Omega(4), Omega(6)) were determined using Judd-Ofelt theory. The photoluminescence emission intensity was appreciably influenced by the Ag NPs concentration changes. Series 2 glass showed the highest emission enhancement factor of 2.04 and 2.15 for the F-5(4)-> I-5(8) (green) and F-5(5)-> I-5(8) (red) transition, respectively. The branching ratio and stimulated emission cross-section of the glasses were estimated from the emission spectra. Intense green and red emission obtained from the proposed glasses may be useful for the development of the efficient solid state laser medium.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据