4.8 Article

Bulk and single-molecule analysis of a bacterial DNA2-like helicase nuclease reveals a single-stranded DNA looping motor

期刊

NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH
卷 48, 期 14, 页码 7991-8005

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkaa562

关键词

-

资金

  1. Wellcome Trust [100401/Z/12/Z]
  2. European Research Council [681299]
  3. Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness (AEI/FEDER, UE) [BFUJ2017-83794-P]
  4. Comunidad de Madrid Tec4Bio [S2018/NMT-4443]
  5. NanoBioCancer [Y2018/BIO-4747]
  6. Wellcome Trust [100401/Z/12/Z] Funding Source: Wellcome Trust
  7. European Research Council (ERC) [681299] Funding Source: European Research Council (ERC)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

DNA2 is an essential enzyme involved in DNA replication and repair in eukaryotes. In a search for homologues of this protein, we identified and characterised Geobacillus stearothermophilus Bad, a bacterial DNA helicase-nuclease with similarity to human DNA2. We show that Bad contains an Fe-S cluster and identify four cysteine residues that are likely to co-ordinate the cluster by analogy to DNA2. The purified enzyme specifically recognises ss-dsDNA junctions and possesses ssDNA-dependent ATPase, ssDNA binding, ssDNA endonuclease, 5' to 3' ssDNA translocase and 5' to 3' helicase activity. Single molecule analysis reveals that Bad is a processive DNA motor capable of moving along DNA for distances of >4 kb at a rate of similar to 200 bp per second at room temperature. Interestingly, as reported for the homologous human and yeast DNA2 proteins, the DNA unwinding activity of Bad is cryptic and can be unmasked by inactivating the intrinsic nuclease activity. Strikingly, our experiments show that the enzyme loops DNA while translocating, which is an emerging feature of processive DNA unwinding enzymes. The bacterial Bad enzymes will provide an excellent model system for understanding the biochemical properties of DNA2-like helicase-nucleases and DNA looping motor proteins in general.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据