4.8 Article

Intrinsic disorder is essential for Cas9 inhibition of anti-CRISPR AcrIIA5

期刊

NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH
卷 48, 期 13, 页码 7584-7594

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkaa512

关键词

-

资金

  1. Cooperative Research Program for Agriculture Science and Technology Development [PJ01495901]
  2. New Breeding Technologies Development Program - Rural Development Administration, Republic of Korea [PJ01480104]
  3. Korea Basic Science Institute Program [D39700]
  4. BK21 Plus Program of the Department of Agricultural Biotechnology, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPRs) and CRISPR-associated (Cas) proteins provide adaptive immunity to prokaryotes against invading phages and plasmids. As a countermeasure, phages have evolved anti-CRISPR (Acr) proteins that neutralize the CRISPR immunity. AcrIIA5, isolated from a virulent phage of Strepto-coccus thermophilus, strongly inhibits diverse Cas9 homologs, but the molecular mechanism underlying the Cas9 inhibition remains unknown. Here, we report the solution structure of AcrIIA5, which features a novel alpha/beta fold connected to an N-terminal intrinsically disordered region (IDR). Remarkably, truncation of the N-terminal IDR abrogates the inhibitory activity against Cas9, revealing that the IDR is essential for Cas9 inhibition by AcrIIA5. Progressive truncations and mutations of the IDR illustrate that the disordered region not only modulates the association between AcrIIA5 and Cas9-sgRNA, but also alters the catalytic efficiency of the inhibitory complex. The length of IDR is critical for the Cas9-sgRNA recognition by AcrIIA5, whereas the charge content of IDR dictates the inhibitory activity. Conformational plasticity of IDR may be linked to the broad-spectrum inhibition of Cas9 homologs by AcrIIA5. Identification of the IDR as the main determinant for Cas9 inhibition expands the inventory of phage anti-CRISPR mechanisms.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据