4.4 Article

Isolation and culture of murine bone marrow-derived macrophages for nitric oxide and redox biology

期刊

NITRIC OXIDE-BIOLOGY AND CHEMISTRY
卷 100, 期 -, 页码 17-29

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.niox.2020.04.005

关键词

Macrophage; MCSF; Tetrahydrobiopterin; Nitric oxide

资金

  1. British Heart Foundation [FS/14/56/31049, RG/17/10/32859, RG/12/5/29576]
  2. NIH Research (NIHR) Oxford Biomedical Research Centre
  3. BHF Centre of Research Excellence, Oxford [RE/13/1/30181, RE/18/3/34214]
  4. Wellcome Trust [090532/Z/09/Z]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Macrophages are mononuclear phagocytes derived from haematopoietic progenitors that are widely distributed throughout the body. These cells participate in both innate and adaptive immune responses and lie central to the processes of inflammation, development, and homeostasis. Macrophage physiology varies depending on the environment in which they reside and they exhibit rapid functional adaption in response to external stimuli. To study macrophages in vitro, cells are typically cultured ex vivo from the peritoneum or alveoli, or differentiated from myeloid bone marrow progenitor cells to form bone marrow-derived macrophages (BMDMs). BMDMs represent an efficient and cog-effective means of studying macrophage biology. However, the inherent sensitivity of macrophages to biochemical stimuli (such as cytokines, metabolic intermediates, and RNS/ROS) makes it imperative to control experimental conditions rigorously. Therefore, the aim of this study was to establish an optimised and standardised method for the isolation and culture of BMDMs. We used classically activated macrophages isolated from WT and nitric oxide (NO)-deficient mice to develop a standardised culture method, whereby the constituents of the culture media are defined. We then methodically compared our standardised protocol to the most commonly used method of BMDM culture to establish an optimal protocol for the study of nitric oxide (NO)-redox biology and immunometabolism in vitro.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据