4.6 Article

Pieris brassicaeeggs trigger interplant systemic acquired resistance against a foliar pathogen in Arabidopsis

期刊

NEW PHYTOLOGIST
卷 228, 期 5, 页码 1652-1661

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/nph.16788

关键词

Below-ground signals; insect eggs; neighborhood effects; plant pathogens; plant-herbivore interactions; plant-plant interactions; systemic acquired resistance (SAR)

资金

  1. Swiss National Science Foundation [31003A_169278]
  2. Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF) [31003A_169278] Funding Source: Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Recognition of plant pathogens or herbivores activate a broad-spectrum plant defense priming in distal leaves against potential future attacks, leading to systemic acquired resistance (SAR). Additionally, attacked plants can release aerial or below-ground signals that trigger defense responses, such as SAR, in neighboring plants lacking initial exposure to pathogen or pest elicitors. However, the molecular mechanisms involved in interplant defense signal generation in sender plants and decoding in neighboring plants are not fully understood. We previously reported thatPieris brassicaeeggs induce intraplant SAR against the foliar pathogenPseudomonas syringaeinArabidopsis thaliana. Here we extend this effect to neighboring plants by discovering an egg-induced interplant SAR via mobile root-derived signal(s). The generation of an egg-induced interplant SAR signal requires pipecolic acid (Pip) pathway genesALD1andFMO1but occurs independently of salicylic acid (SA) accumulation in sender plants. Furthermore, reception of the signal leads to accumulation of SA in the recipient plants. In response to insect eggs, plants may induce interplant SAR to prepare for potential pathogen invasion following feeding-induced wounding or to keep neighboring plants healthy for hatching larvae. Our results highlight a previously uncharacterized below-ground plant-to-plant signaling mechanism and reveals genetic components required for its generation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据