4.6 Article

Quantum probing beyond pure dephasing

期刊

NEW JOURNAL OF PHYSICS
卷 22, 期 8, 页码 -

出版社

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/1367-2630/aba0e5

关键词

quantum metrology; open quantum systems; quantum probing; quantum Fisher information

资金

  1. Joint Project 'Quantum Information Processing in Non-Markovian Quantum Complex Systems' - Freiburg Institute for Advanced Studies (FRIAS, University of Freiburg)
  2. Institute of Advanced Research (IAR, Nagoya University)
  3. UniMi through the APC initiative
  4. UniMi through the 'Sviluppo UniMi' project

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Quantum probing is the art of exploiting simple quantum systems interacting with a complex environment to extract precise information about some environmental parameters, e.g. the temperature of the environment or its spectral density. Here we analyze the performance of a single-qubit probe in characterizing Ohmic bosonic environments at thermal equilibrium. In particular, we analyze the effects of tuning the interaction Hamiltonian between the probe and the environment, going beyond the traditional paradigm of pure dephasing. In the weak-coupling and short-time regime, we address the dynamics of the probe analytically, whereas numerical simulations are employed in the strong coupling and long-time regime. We then evaluate the quantum Fisher information for the estimation of the cutoff frequency and the temperature of the environment. Our results provide clear evidence that pure dephasing is not optimal, unless we focus attention to short times. In particular, we found several working regimes where the presence of a transverse interaction improves the maximum attainable precision, i.e. it increases the quantum Fisher information. We also explore the role of the initial state of the probe and of the probe characteristic frequency in determining the estimation precision, thus providing quantitative guidelines to design optimized detection to characterize bosonic environments at the quantum level.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据