4.4 Review

Isoflurane versus sevoflurane for early brain injury and expression of sphingosine kinase 1 after experimental subarachnoid hemorrhage

期刊

NEUROSCIENCE LETTERS
卷 733, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.neulet.2020.135142

关键词

Subarachnoid hemorrhage; Early brain injury; Isoflurane; Sevoflurane; Sphingosine kinase-1

资金

  1. NIH [NS060936, NS053407]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The first step to treat aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) is aneurysmal obliteration under general anesthesia but not treat the SAH itself and the secondary effects. However, the identification of anesthetics with properties that help to attenuate post-SAH brain injury can be useful for improving outcomes of SAH patients. We examined whether 2% isoflurane and 3% sevoflurane posttreatment are protective against early brain injury (EBI) after SAH. This study used 87 8-week-old male CD-1 mice. We induced SAH by endovascular perforation in mice. Animals were randomly divided into 4 groups: sham-operated (n = 16), SAH+ vehicle-medical air (n = 26), SAH+ 2% isoflurane (n = 22), and SAH+ 3% sevoflurane (n = 23). Neurobehavioral function, brain water content and Western blotting were evaluated at 24 h. The expression of sphingosine kinase (SphK), cleaved caspase-3 and cyclooxygenase-2 (COX2) was determined by Western blotting. Cell death was examined by terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase-mediated uridine 5'-triphosphate-biotin nick end-labeling staining. Both 2% isoflurane and 3% sevoflurane significantly improved neurobehavioral function, and brain edema at 24 h after SAH and attenuated cell death, associated with an increase in SphK1, a decrease in cleaved caspase-3 and COX2. The neuroprotective effects were similar between 2% isoflurane and 3% sevoflurane. These findings suggest that both 2% isoflurane and 3% sevoflurane significantly inhibited EBI by suppressing post-SAH apoptosis and brain inflammation possibly via the SphK1-related pathway.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据