4.6 Article

The morphology of high frequency oscillations (HFO) does not improve delineating the epileptogenic zone

期刊

CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY
卷 127, 期 4, 页码 2140-2148

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2016.01.002

关键词

HFO; iEEG; Epilepsy; Ripple; Filter effect; Sharp spike

资金

  1. Laszlo and Etelka Kohler Brain@McGill Graduate/Postdoctoral Travel Award
  2. Vontobel Stiftung
  3. EMDO Stiftung
  4. Herzog-Egli Stiftung
  5. Austrian Science Funds (Schroedinger fellowship) [J3485-B24]
  6. Canadian Institutes of Health Research [MOP-102710]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: We hypothesized that high frequency oscillations (HFOs) with irregular amplitude and frequency more specifically reflect epileptogenicity than HFOs with stable amplitude and frequency. Methods: We developed a fully automatic algorithm to detect HFOs and classify them based on their morphology, with types defined according to regularity in amplitude and frequency: type 1 with regular amplitude and frequency; type 2 with irregular amplitude, which could result from filtering of sharp spikes; type 3 with irregular frequency; and type 4 with irregular amplitude and frequency. We investigated the association of different HFO types with the seizure onset zone (SOZ), resected area and surgical outcome. Results: HFO rates of all types were significantly higher inside the SOZ than outside. HFO types 1 and 2 were strongly correlated to each other and showed the highest rates among all HFOs. Their occurrence was highly associated with the SOZ, resected area and surgical outcome. The automatic detection emulated visual markings with 93% true positives and 57% false detections. Conclusions: HFO types 1 and 2 similarly reflect epileptogenicity. Significance: For clinical application, it may not be necessary to separate real HFOs from false oscillations produced by the filter effect of sharp spikes. Also for automatically detected HFOs, surgical outcome is better when locations with higher HFO rates are included in the resection. (C) 2016 International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据