4.6 Article

Characteristics of local field potentials correlate with pain relief by deep brain stimulation

期刊

CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY
卷 127, 期 7, 页码 2573-2580

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2016.04.011

关键词

Deep brain stimulation; Neuropathic pain; Local field potentials; Neural oscillations; Spectra; Time-frequency

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81471745]
  2. Suzhou Key Laboratory of Neural Engineering and Technology [SZS01414]
  3. Suzhou Medical Device and Medicine Key Program [ZXY201425]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: To investigate the link between neuronal activity recorded from the sensory thalamus and periventricular gray/periaqueductal gray (PVAG) and pain relief by deep brain stimulation (DBS). Methods: Local field potentials (LFPs) were recorded from the sensory thalamus and PVAG post-operatively from ten patients with neuropathic pain. The LFPs were quantified using spectral and time-frequency analysis, the relationship between the LFPs and pain relief was quantified with nonlinear correlation analysis. Results: The theta oscillations of both sensory thalamus and PVAG correlated inversely with pain relief. The high beta oscillations in the sensory thalamus and the alpha oscillations in the PVAG correlated positively with pain relief. Moreover, the ratio of high-power duration to low-power duration of theta band activity in the sensory thalamus and PVAG correlated inversely with pain relief. The duration ratio at the high beta band in the sensory thalamus correlated positively with pain relief. Conclusions: Our results reveal distinct neuronal oscillations at the theta, alpha, and beta frequencies correlating with pain relief by DBS. Significance: The study provides quantitative measures for predicting the outcomes of neuropathic pain relief by DBS as well as potential biomarkers for developing adaptive stimulation strategies. (C) 2016 International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据