4.6 Article

A graph embedding based model for fine-grained POI recommendation

期刊

NEUROCOMPUTING
卷 428, 期 -, 页码 376-384

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.neucom.2020.01.118

关键词

Self-driving; POI recommendation; Aspect-based recommendation; Graph embedding

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61872258, 61772356]
  2. Dongguan Innovative Research Team Program [2018607201008]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study proposes a novel POI-based item recommendation model via graph embedding, which effectively addresses data sparsity and cold start issues, as well as accurately capturing dynamic user preferences. Experimental results demonstrate that the model significantly outperforms existing baselines on three datasets.
Point-of-interest (POI) recommendation is an important technique widely used in self-driving services. While POI recommendation aims to recommend unvisited POIs to self-driving users, users always expect their intended items can be suggested together with these POIs, e.g. what activities to perform at the recommended places. However, existing methods cannot well support such POI recommendation in a finer granularity. In this paper, we investigate this new problem and propose a novel POI-based item recommendation model via graph embedding. The model accurately captures the joint effect of geographical and temporal influences on both POI-level and item-level recommendation in a shared space, which can address data sparsity and cold start problems effectively. To optimize the model efficiently and accurately, a novel weighted negative sampling strategy is designed. Besides, we propose a novel fine-grained user dynamic preference modeling method, which can accurately capture dynamic user preferences in a finer granularity based on the embeddings of both POIs and items. Comprehensive experimental studies have been conducted on three datasets. Results show that our model achieves significant improvement over state-of-the-art baselines. (C) 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据